Bombay High Court
ANAND JAYANT RAYATEversusNEHA ANAND RAYATE
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Anand Jayant Rayate, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Neha Anand Rayate. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute had already been resolved by the Family Court at Pune, rendering the writ petition unnecessary. The court considered this submission and examined whether the petition remained viable. It concluded that the matter was already disposed of by the Family Court. Consequently, the High Court held that the writ petition was infructuous. The petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous and should be dismissed due to prior disposal by the Family Court?
Subjects
- family law
- writ petition
- infructuous
- petition disposal
Judgment
8-WP(ST)-17323-24 (C).doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 17323 OF 2024
Anand Jayant Rayate ...Petitioner
VERSUS
Neha Anand Rayate ...Respondent
_________________________________________________________________
SONALI by
Digitally signed
SONALI
Mr. Vaibhav Swami i/b. Mr. Pritam Runwal, Advocate for Petitioner.
SATISH KILAJE
SATISH Date:
2026.09.09 _________________________________________________________________
KILAJE 13:50:50
+0530
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter before
the Family Court at Pune is disposed of hence this petition has become
infructuous. Hence, requested to dispose of the petition.
3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the
petitioner, Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…