Bombay High Court
KAVITA JAYESH PANOTversusJAYESH NARESHCHANDRA PANOT
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
A writ petition (No. 1737 of 2025) was filed by Vaishali Anil against Tikam seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The dismissal resulted in the petition being closed without any order against the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on account of non‑prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- non‑prosecution
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
8-WP-1737-2025 (C).doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1737 OF 2025
VAISHALI Kavita Jayesh Panot ...Petitioner/s
ANIL VERSUS
TIKAM
Jayesh Nareshchandra Panot ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM _________________________________________________________________
Date:
2026.09.29 None for the Petitioner.
10:33:56 +0530
Mr. Aminish M. Dighe i/by Dinesh D. Tiwari & Associates, for the
Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C. :
1. None present for Petitioner.
2. Matter is kept under the caption ‘ for dismissal’.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.