Bombay High Court
HEENABEN NARPATSINH PARMARversusRESIDENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for prosecution, apparently due to loss of interest and the passage of time. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, under its inherent powers, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Aarti Sathe on 6 October 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
25-WP-1759-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1759 OF 2024
Heenaben Narpatsinh Parmar ...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Resident Deputy Collector and others ...Respondent(s)
_________________________________________________________________
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Deepam Upadhyay h.f Mr. Aayush Kedia, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to
3.
Adv. P.G. Sawant, AGP, for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE: 06th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C.
None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. It seems that the Petitioner has
lost interest in prosecuting the present Petition on account of passage of time. In
view thereof, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(AARTI SATHE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Tiwari
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.