Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NILESH SUBHASH MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Nilesh Subhash More filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition in order to pursue a statutory remedy available under law. The court considered the request and, noting the petitioner's intention, allowed the withdrawal. No merits of the original petition were adjudicated. The petition was consequently disposed of as withdrawn, with the court indicating that all parties' contentions remain open for any future proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request before adjudication?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • statutory remedy
  • high court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by
         TRUPTI
TRUPTI   SADANAND
SADANAND BAMNE
BAMNE    Date:
         2026.01.01
         12:45:05
         +0530

                                                                              1.WP-17644-2025.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         WRIT PETITION NO.17644 OF 2025
                      Nilesh Subhash More                         ….Petitioner
                                Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.             ….Respondents

                      Ms.Nikita Anandache (through video conferencing) i/b. Mr.Trunal
                      Tonape for the Petitioner.
                      Ms.Kavita N. Solunke, Addl. GP (through video conferencing) for
                      the Respondent -State
                      Mr. S.B. Shetye (through video conferencing) for the Respondent -
                      State Election Commission.

                                                      ----
                                              CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
                                                     (VACATION COURT)

                                              DATE   : 01st JANUARY, 2026

                      P.C. :-


                      1.             The hearing in this matter is conducted through the

                      video conferencing facility from the Chiplun Taluka Court.



                      2.             The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has moved a

                      praecipe yesterday requesting for the listing of this Petition today,

                      on instruction from the Petitioner, to withdraw this Petition. It is

                      informed by the learned Advocate that the Petitioner desires to avail



                      Nishad Patil                      1 of 2
                                                         1.WP-17644-2025.odt




of a statutory remedy as is permissible in law. For the said purpose,

the Petitioner desires to withdraw the Petition.



3.             In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn, on instructions. If the Petitioner avails of the remedy as

is permissible in law, all contentions of all the stakeholders are kept

open.




                                      (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
                                        (VACATION COURT)




Nishad Patil                      2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.