Bombay High Court
VRUNDA SKYSCRAPERS THR ITS PARTNERS T. S. MITTAL AND ANRversusPIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court ordered that the petitioners' application be considered along with other pending applications in accordance with the law and disposed of the petition.
Summary
The petitioners, Vrunda Skyscrapers and another, filed a writ petition seeking only directions, not a cause of action, against the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation. They requested that their application dated 14 July 2025 be considered together with other pending applications, with uniform application of the relevant statutory provisions. The court noted that the petition was purely for procedural directions and not for substantive relief. It directed that the application be processed along with all other similar applications, following the due legal procedure and as expeditiously as possible. Accordingly, the court disposed of the petition without further order.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition seeking only directions, without a cause of action, is maintainable.
- Whether the petitioners' application should be considered together with other pending applications under uniform statutory application.
Subjects
- directions
- procedural law
- municipal corporation
- pending applications
- uniform application of statute
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
GAURI AMIT
GAURI GAEKWAD
AMIT Date:
35.WP-17725-2025.odt
GAEKWAD 2026.03.06
11:13:45
+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.17725 OF 2025
M/s. Vrunda Skyscrapers and Anr. ….Petitioners
Versus
Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ….Respondent
----
Mr. Vinod P. Sangvikar for the Petitioners.
Mr. Sandeep Dilip Shinde for the Respondent.
----
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
&
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 4th MARCH, 2026
P.C. :-
1. The learned Advocates for the Petitioners and the
Corporation submit that this Petition is only for directions and not
on account of any cause of action against the Corporation.
2. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that
the application made by the Petitioners on 14 th July, 2025 be
considered along with the applications filed by many others, if any,
by uniformly applying the provisions of the statute.
Gauri Gaekwad 1 of 2
35.WP-17725-2025.odt
3. In view of the above statement, we would expect that
the said application would be considered along with all other
pending applications filed by many others, in the same cause, by
following the due procedure laid down in law, as expeditiously as
possible.
4. This Petition is disposed off.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad 2 of 2
Checking your session…