Bombay High Court
UDAY JAGANNATH GHODKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition is allowed.
Summary
Petitioner Uday Jagannath Ghodke filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The petition was argued by Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat and co‑counsel for the petitioner, while the State was represented by Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar and Respondent No.2 by Mr. Piyush Toshnival. The Court heard the submissions of both sides on September 18, 2026. Due to a shortage of time, the Court did not dictate detailed reasons for its decision at the hearing. The writ petition was ultimately allowed, with a reasoned order to be issued later.
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- High Court
- petition allowed
- procedural order
Judgment
28.WP.1825.2023.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1825 OF 2023
Uday Jagannath Ghodke .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
....................
Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat, Advocate i/by Ms. Aditi S. Naikare a/w. S.M.
Gabu and Ms. Priyanka Bhoite for Petitioner.
Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent – State.
Mr. Piyush Toshnival, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.
......…...........
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Thorat, learned Advocate for Petitioner; Mr.
Karmakar, learned APP for Respondent – State and Mr. Toshnival,
learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. After hearing the learned
Advocates fully, the Writ Petition stands allowed.
2. However, due to paucity of time the reasons are not dictated.
Reasoned order shall follow in due course.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally signed
by AJAY
AJAY TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.19
14:29:12 +0530
1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.