Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHANDRAKALABAI WD/O. DILIP KALE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court held that the death was natural as per the magistrate's enquiry and the Human Rights Commission report, and therefore no compensation could be awarded.

Summary

The petitioners, the wife of undertrial prisoner Dilip Kale and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking Rs.10,00,000 compensation alleging that jail authorities failed to provide adequate medical treatment, leading to Kale's death on 09.08.2018. The State submitted that Kale had been admitted to a government medical hospital for nine days before his death. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, conducted an enquiry under Section 176(1‑A) of the CrPC and concluded that Kale died of a natural illness. The petitioner herself had earlier stated she had no complaint against anyone regarding the death, and the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission also observed that the death was natural. Relying on these findings, the Court dismissed the petition, granting no compensation.

Issues considered

  • Whether the death of an undertrial prisoner due to alleged medical negligence by jail authorities warrants compensation under criminal writ jurisdiction.
  • Whether the findings of the Judicial Magistrate's enquiry under Section 176(1‑A) CrPC establishing natural death preclude any relief.
  • Whether the petitioners have standing to claim compensation in the absence of a specific complaint of negligence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • compensation
  • prisoner death
  • medical negligence
  • natural death
  • Section 176 CrPC
  • human rights commission
  • criminal writ petition

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40397-DB

                                                      922 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 184 OF 2021




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        922 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 184 OF 2021

                           Chandrakalabai Wd/o. Dilip Kale And Another
                                             Versus
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                   __________________________________________________________
                     • Adv. Pankaj A. Bharat h/f. Adv. Gaikwad Satish A. for
                        the Petitioners
                     • Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.P.P. for State
                   __________________________________________________________

                                     CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATE      : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)             Heard.



                   2)             The petitioners have filed this petition seeking

                   direction to pay compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to them

                   on account of the alleged failure on the part of the jail

                   authorities to provide proper medical treatment to the

                   undertrial prisoner, Dilip Kale, who ultimately died on

                   09.08.2018.



                   3)             Learned   Additional    Public       Prosecutor,          by

                   pointing out the affidavit-in-reply and the documents


                   Komal Kamble                                                   Page| 1 of 3
                                 922 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 184 OF 2021




annexed thereto, submitted that the deceased, namely,

inmate Dilip Kale, was ill and was admitted to the

Government Medical Hospital for about nine days prior to

his death.



4)             On going through the documents annexed to

the affidavit-in-reply, it appears that the concerned Judicial

Magistrate First Class (J.M.F.C.), Aurangabad, had also

conducted an enquiry into the death of Dilip Kale under

Section 176(1-A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

On going through the said enquiry report, it appears that

the learned J.M.F.C. had come to the conclusion that the

death of Dilip Kale was due to his illness and was a natural

death.



5)             Even the Petitioner No. 1 had stated, at the

relevant time, that she had no complaint against anybody

in respect of the death of Dilip Kale. The report of the

concerned J.M.F.C. dated 12.02.2019 was also considered

by the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission on

26.04.2023, which observed that Dilip Kale had died




Komal Kamble                                                 Page| 2 of 3
                                   922 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 184 OF 2021




naturally and that there was nothing to indicate that he

had died an unnatural death.



6)             Thus, we are not inclined to grant any relief to

the petitioners. In view of the same, the Criminal Writ

Petitoin stands dismissed.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)            (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
          JUDGE                            JUDGE




Komal Kamble                                                   Page| 3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.