Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRADDHA KANHAIYYA PADWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition may be withdrawn with liberty to adopt the alternate remedy provided under Sections 22Q and 22S of the Maharashtra Police Act.

Summary

Smt. Shraddha Kanhaiyya Padwal filed a writ petition challenging alleged misconduct by police officers. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Sagar G. Talekar, sought permission to withdraw the petition and instead pursue remedies under Sections 22Q and 22S of the Maharashtra Police Act. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, were represented by Ms. Supriya Kak. The Court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn without prejudice and whether the petitioner could be directed to use the statutory remedies. The judges granted the request, allowing the petition to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate statutory forum. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request
  • Whether the petitioner may be directed to pursue alternative remedies under Sections 22Q and 22S of the Maharashtra Police Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • police misconduct
  • Maharashtra Police Act
  • alternative remedy

Judgment

                              Ingale                                                15-wp-186-26.odt



                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         Digitally signed
URMILA   by URMILA
         PRAMOD                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PRAMOD   INGALE
         Date:
INGALE   2026.07.23
         10:55:20 +0530

                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2026

                            Smt. Shraddha Kanhaiyya Padwal                 … Petitioner
                                  Versus
                            State of Maharashtra and ors.                  .… Respondents

                                                             ****
                            Mr. Sagar G. Talekar, for the Petitioner.
                            Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                                             ****
                                                    CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
                                                               ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.

                                                        DATE : 22nd JULY, 2026

                            P.C. :


                            1.         Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.     There are

                            allegations against the police officers.   Learned counsel for the

                            Petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this

                            Petition with liberty to adopt alternate remedy provided under

                            Sections 22Q & 22S of the Maharashtra Police Act.


                            2. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn

                            with such liberty and the same is disposed of accordingly.



                            (ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.)                  (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)



                                                            1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.