Bombay High Court
MANJUBEN ALIAS MANGUBEN PANCHALversusNIKKHIDILAL GUPTA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Manjuben alis Manguben Panchal, filed a writ petition but failed to appear on the scheduled hearing dates, including the final adjournment. The respondent, Nikkhidilal Gupta, was represented by Ms. Anusha Amin. The Court, noting the petitioner's non‑appearance, adjourned the matter as a last opportunity, but the petitioner still did not appear. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution and held the pending interim application as infructuous. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- adjournment
- infructuous interim application
- civil procedure
Judgment
11-WP-1881-2018.docx
rrpillai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1881 OF 2018
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17735 OF 2023
Manjuben alis Manguben … Petitioner
Panchal
Vs.
Nikkhidilal Gupta … Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Anusha Amin for the Respondent.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER 2026
ORDER :
1. Since none had appeared on the last date, the writ
petition was adjourned as a last chance.
2. Even today none appears for the petitioner.
3. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Pending interim application is disposed of as
infructuous.
Digitally
signed by
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
RAJESHWARI
RAJESHWARI RAMESH
RAMESH PILLAI
PILLAI Date:
2026.09.16 1/1
10:43:08
+0530
Checking your session…