Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIVEK NITIN KANTAWALAversusMRUNAL VIKRAM RAWAL AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of on the basis of the parties’ consent terms.

Summary

The petitioner, Vivek Nitin Kantawala, filed a writ petition (No. 18831 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court. The parties reached a settlement and submitted consent terms to the court. The learned counsel for the petitioner informed the court of the settlement, and the court accepted the consent terms. Consequently, the court ordered the writ petition to be disposed of. Additionally, the court directed the de‑tagging of certain civil revision applications (Nos. 423 and 424 of 2016) and listed them for September 1, 2026, while ordering the remaining civil revisions to be listed for September 2, 2026. No further pleadings were required.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be disposed of on the basis of a settlement and consent terms between the parties

Subjects

  • consent decree
  • writ petition
  • civil revision
  • settlement
  • disposal

Judgment

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        WRIT PETITION NO.18831 OF 2024


Vivek Nitin Kantawala                 ....   Petitioner
            Vs.
Mrunal Vikram Rawal & Anr.            ....   Respondents

                              WITH
               INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6403 OF 2024
                               IN
         CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 2834 OF 2024

Shri. Gokuldas M. Thomani             ....   Applicant
(deceased) through LR Satishbhai
J. Dattani
             Vs.

The State of Maharashtra              ....   Respondents

                               WITH
             CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 424 OF 2016

Albert John Berlie & Anr.             ....   Applicants
         Vs.
Krishnaraj P. Kalapi & Ors.           ....   Respondents

                               WITH
             CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 423 OF 2016

Albert John Berlie & Anr.             ....   Applicants
         Vs.
Krishnaraj P. Kalapi & Ors.           ....   Respondents

                               WITH
                INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 888 OF 2021
                                IN
             CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 423 OF 2016
                                     1/3
28 WP 18831.24+IA.doc                                      Dusane
Krishnaraj P. Kalapi & Ors.              ....   Applicants
         Vs.
Albert John Berlie & Anr.                ....   Respondents

                                WITH
              CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.590 OF 2023

Krishnaraj P. Kalapi & Ors.              ....   Applicants
         Vs.
Albert John Berlie (deceased)            ....   Respondents
thru’ LRs Coral A. Berlie & Ors.


Mr. Jash B. Vyas, i/b Jash B. Vyas, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Udeshi a/w Mr. Rahul Sanghvi i/b M/s Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for
Respondent no.2.

Mr. Vivek Kantawala, party in-person
Mrs. Chaula Poddar – Respondent no. 2, present in Court.

                                  CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
                                  DATE   : 18th August 2026
P.C. :

         Writ Petition No. 18831 of 2024

1.       Learned counsel submits that the parties have settled their dispute and

place the consent terms on record.

2.       In view of the Consent Terms, the Writ Petition No. 18831 of 2024

stands disposed of.

         IN CRAs :

1.       De-tag Civil Revisions Applications 423 of 2016 and 424 of 2016 and

list the same on 1st September, 2026.
                                        2/3
28 WP 18831.24+IA.doc                                                  Dusane
2.     List the remaining Civil Revision Applications on 2nd September 2026.

Pleadings if any, be completed.



                                               [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ]




                                    3/3
28 WP 18831.24+IA.doc                                              Dusane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.