Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABHISHEK SHASHANK MAITYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prosecute the writ.

Summary

Abhishek Shashank Maity filed a criminal writ petition (CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2023) before the High Court of Bombay challenging the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled dates. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP. The Court, presided over by Justice Shivkumar Dige, observed the petitioner’s failure to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                                                                              25-WP-1885-2023 (CR).doc


                              N.S.Kamble


                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2023

                              Abhishek Shashank Maity                     ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                              The State of Maharashtra                    ...Respondent
                              ____________________________________________________________
                              None for the Petitioner.
                              Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.
           Digitally signed
NILAM   by NILAM
        SANTOSH
                              Mr.Ulhas D. Wadwalkar, PsI, Dindoshi Police station.
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date: 2026.09.17
           10:54:25 +0530
                              ____________________________________________________________
                                                                   CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                   DATE           : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                              P.C. :

                              .              None present for the Petitioner.

                              2.             On the last date also none was present for the Petitioner.

                              3.             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                                                  (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                    Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.