Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAKASH DATTA PATILversusTHE ELECTION OFFICER WARD NO. 27 AND 28 THANE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The court disposed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to withdraw.

Summary

The petitioner, Prakash Datta Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Election Officer and others. Before arguments began, the petitioner, through counsel Amogh Karandikar, expressed an intention to withdraw the writ petition and instead pursue an election petition if necessary. The petitioner also requested liberty to withdraw the petition. The court considered whether such a withdrawal with liberty could be permitted. It allowed the withdrawal, disposing of the writ petition while keeping all contentions of the parties open for any future proceedings. Consequently, the petition was marked as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition and retain liberty to file an election petition later?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • election petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court
  • liberty to withdraw

Judgment

          Digitally
          signed by
GAURI     GAURI AMIT
          GAEKWAD
AMIT      Date:
GAEKWAD   2026.01.03                                                            1.WP-19-2026.odt
          13:54:18
          +0530


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO.19 OF 2026
                  Prakash Datta Patil                            ….Petitioner
                            Versus
                  The Election Officer,
                  Ward Nos.27 and 28,
                  Thane Municipal Corporation & Ors.            ….Respondents
                                                    ----
                  Mr. Amogh Karandikar for the Petitioner.
                  Mr. Prakash D. Patil, Petitioner present in person.
                  Mr. A.S. Jadhav a/w. Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Respondent Nos.1 and
                  3.
                  Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye a/w. Mr. Akshay S. Pansare and Mr. Nipun
                  Sawane for Respondent No.2.
                  Mr. Chirag Shah a/w. Mr. Shyam Jadhav for Respondent No.4.
                  Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. GP for Respondent No.5.
                                                    ----
                                        CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
                                                   (VACATION COURT)

                                        DATE     : 3rd JANUARY, 2026

                  P.C. :-

                  1.              Before the opening of submissions, the learned

                  Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner who

                  is present in the Court hall, submits that the Petitioner would avail

                  of the remedy of filing an Election Petition, as the case may arise,

                  and seeks liberty to withdraw this Petition.




                  Gauri Gaekwad                     1 of 2
                                                           1.WP-19-2026.odt




2.              In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn, on instructions, with liberty as prayed. All contentions

of all the stakeholders are kept open.




                                       (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
                                          (VACATION COURT)




Gauri Gaekwad                      2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.