Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANOHAR JAGANNATH PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

A writ petition under Article 226 seeking CBI investigation is not maintainable where the Supreme Court has held otherwise, and thus must be dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Manohar Jagannath Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the Central Bureau of Investigation to lodge a crime and conduct a time-bound investigation into his complaints. The High Court examined the maintainability of the petition in light of a recent Supreme Court decision. The Court noted that the Supreme Court in Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. had set a precedent that similar petitions are not maintainable. Accordingly, the High Court held that the present petition could not be entertained. The petition was therefore disposed of without any order directing a CBI investigation.

Issues considered

  • What is the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking CBI investigation in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra?

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • Writ Petition
  • Maintainability
  • CBI Investigation
  • Supreme Court Precedent

Judgment

                    KSG                                                           20-WP-1906-2026.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.1906 OF 2026

                    Manohar Jagannath Patil                                      … Petitioner
                             V/s.
                    State of Maharashtra & Ors                                   … Respondents
                                        _______________________________________

                    Adv. M.S. Almelkan a/w Adv. Dastagir Basir Shaikh i/b Adv. Akshay Rane for
                    the Petitioner.
                    Adv. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
                    Adv. Satya M. Shehigav for the Respondent Nos.9 and 10.
                    Adv. S.A. Pakhare, P.S.I. attached to Walvi Police Station.
                                    _______________________________________

                                                CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                        KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE  : 3rd SEPTEMBER, 2026

                    P.C. :

                    1)              Present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is

                    filed for lodgment of crime by the C.B.I. and to conduct time bound
       Digitally
       signed by
       KIRAN
KIRAN SANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE Date:
       2026.09.07
                    investigation into the complaints of the Petitioner.
       16:44:13
       +0530


                    2)              In view of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of

                    Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., reported in

                    2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, present Petition is not maintainable and is

                    accordingly disposed off.



                                    ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

                                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.