Bombay High Court
VIJAY PRAKASH DEVWRAT TYAGIversusMAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition, confirming that the parties' rights are governed by the registered agreement dated 18 August 2026.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition against the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) and other respondents. The developer (Respondent No.6) submitted that a settlement agreement had been executed and registered on 18 August 2026, thereby resolving the dispute. The petitioner’s counsel accepted this submission and raised no objection to disposing of the petition. Other respondents also agreed to the disposal. The Court therefore disposed of the writ petition, confirming that the parties' rights and contentions will be governed by the registered agreement, subject to any final order by the Minister of Housing. The petition was consequently closed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be dismissed on the ground that the parties have executed and registered a settlement agreement.
Subjects
- writ petition
- settlement agreement
- registration
- disposal
- MHADA
- developer
- court order
- settlement
Judgment
Digitally signed
by MAYUR
MAYUR KONDIRAM
KONDIRAM ADANE
ADANE Date:
2026.08.19
6-WP-1982-2026 (OS).DOC
18:28:21 +0530
Mayur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1982 OF 2026
Vijay Prakash Devwrat Tyagi …Petitioner
Versus
Maharashtra Housing And Area Development …Respondent
Authority
Mr. Pradip Kadam, a/w Hemant Hasnale, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Siddharth S. Chandrashekhar, for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3
(MHADA).
Ms. Punita Arora, a/w Mr. Puneet Arora, i/b Arora & Co. for the
Respondent No. 6.
Ms. Anuja Tirmali, a/w Mr. Arvind Rathod, i/b Komal Punjabi for
the Respondent No. 6.
Ms. Shrushti Bharat Pawar, for the Respondent No. 7.
CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM &
ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
DATED: 19th AUGUST 2026.
PC:-
1. Ms. Punita Arora, learned counsel appearing for Respondent
No. 6 - Developer, submits that pursuant to the orders dated 21 st
July 2026, 4th August 2026 and 6th August 2026 passed by this
Court, an agreement has not only been executed by the in between
the Petitioner and Respondent No. 6, but the same has also been
Page 1 of 2
6-WP-1982-2026 (OS).DOC
registered, thus putting an end to the dispute involved in this Writ
Petition. Therefore, the matter can be closed.
2. Mr. Pradip Kadam, learned counsel for the Petitioner, in his
usual fairness, has accepted such submission of Ms. Arora and has
submitted that he has no objection to dispose of the writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the other Respondents also do not have
any objection to such an order.
4. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is hereby disposed of
by confirming that the rights and contentions of the contesting
parties shall stand governed by the registered agreement, which
has been executed by the parties on 18th August 2026.
5. We, however, reiterate that the terms and conditions of the
agreement dated 18th August 2026 shall abide by the final order
that may be passed in the proceedings preferred by Respondent
No. 6 - Developer before the Hon’ble Minister of Housing,
Government of Maharashtra.
6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
{
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.