Bombay High Court

TUSHAR CHANDRASHEKAR DALVIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided: 24 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

Mr. Tushar Chandrashekhar Dalvi filed Writ Petition No.1992 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The respondent State was represented by Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP. The Court noted the petitioner's non-appearance and deemed the petition to be non-prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on 24 September 2026.

Issues considered

Whether the petition can proceed in the absence of the petitioner
Whether the petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution

Subjects

writ petition
non-prosecution
dismissal
procedural default
high court

Judgment

                           apn                                                   44-wp-1992-2026.doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 1992 OF 2026


                      Mr.Tushar Chandrashekhar Dalvi                        … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      State of Maharashtra & Ors.                           … Respondents



                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :        A. S. GADKARI AND
ASHWINI
PRASAD                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
NARHIRE                                                    DATE :      24th September, 2026
Digitally signed by
ASHWINI PRASAD
NARHIRE
Date: 2026.10.03
14:39:23 +0530        P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                 (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                      (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                                                       1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Ajay S Patil