Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUMIT JAINversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ACB, MUMBAI AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS.

Summary

Petitioner Sumit Jain filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the return of property and invoking an alternative remedy under the BNSS. The petition was opposed by the Central Bureau of Investigation and the State. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue the BNSS remedy. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It granted leave to withdraw the petition and allowed the petitioner to seek the alternative remedy. The petition was subsequently marked as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and retain the liberty to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS for the return of property

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • property return
  • BNSS
  • Bombay High Court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                         DTG                                                          13-Wp-1995-2026.doc



                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 1995 OF 2026

                         Sumit Jain                                                 … Petitioner
                                  V/s.
                         The Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr.                 … Respondents
                                            _______________________________________

                         Mr. Aditya Talpade a/w Mr. Prajwal Padole i/b Mr. Pratik Karande for the
                         Petitioner.

                         Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Ms. Yukta Sawant, Mr. Sumitkumar Nimbalkar and Mr.
                         Anay Joshi for Respondent No.1-C.B.I.

                         Mr. Ajay S. Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
                                           _______________________________________

                                                     CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                     DATE  : 1st September 2026

                         P.C. :

                         1)              Learned counsel for Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to

                         withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy under the provisions

                         of the BNSS, for return of the property.

                         1.1)            Leave and liberty granted.

                         2)              Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.




                                         ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM   TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.09.08
                                                                                                            1/1
            15:14:51 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.