Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIKAS KUMAR MEENA @ VIKASH MEENAversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court granted leave to withdraw the petition and permitted the petitioner to avail an alternative remedy under the BNSS.

Summary

Vikas Kumar Meena filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Central Bureau of Investigation and the State. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS for the return of property. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted without prejudice to the petitioner’s other legal avenues. After hearing the submissions, the judges granted leave to withdraw the petition and expressly allowed the petitioner to seek the alternative remedy. Consequently, the petition was formally withdrawn and the matter was closed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be granted leave to withdraw the writ petition while preserving the right to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • alternative remedy
  • BNSS
  • writ petition
  • Bombay High Court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                             DTG                                                          16-Wp-1998-2026.doc



                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 1998 OF 2026

                             Vikas Kumar Meena @ Vikash Meena                           … Petitioner
                                      V/s.
                             The Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr                  … Respondents
                                                _______________________________________

                             Mr. Aditya Talpade a/w Mr. Prajwal Padole i/b Mr. Pratik Karande for the
                             Petitioner.

                             Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Ms. Yukta Sawant, Mr. Sumitkumar Nimbalkar and Mr.
                             Anay Joshi for Respondent No.1-C.B.I.

                             Ms. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
                                               _______________________________________

                                                         CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE  : 1st September 2026

                             P.C. :

                             1)              Learned counsel for Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to

                             withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy under the provisions

                             of the BNSS, for return of the property.

                             1.1)            Leave and liberty granted.

                             2)              Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.




                                             ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

               Digitally signed by
               DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR     Date: 2026.09.08
               15:17:13 +0530
                                                                                                                1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.