Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RATNABAI SUBODH PATILversusTHE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn on the petitioner's instructions.

Summary

Petitioner Ratnabai Subodh Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State Election Commission and the State. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and indicated a possible future filing of an election petition. The court, after noting the petitioner's instructions, ordered the writ petition to be disposed of as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue any further relief. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated. All contentions of the parties remain open for any future proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner at any stage of the proceedings?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil procedure
  • election petition
  • high court

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by
         TRUPTI
TRUPTI   SADANAND
SADANAND BAMNE
BAMNE    Date:
         2026.01.02                                                                1-wp-2-2-26.odt
         19:27:10
         +0530




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2026

                      Ratnabai Subodh Patil                                … Petitioner
                            versus
                      The State Election Commission & Ors.                 … Respondents


                      Mr.A.N.Sabnis (through video conferencing) i/b. Mr.Amol S.
                      Sawant for the Petitioner.
                      Mr.P.P.Kakade, Addl.GP (through video conferencing) for the
                      Respondent -State.
                      Mr. S.B. Shetye for the Respondent - State Election Commission.

                                                    ----
                                            CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
                                                   (VACATION COURT)

                                            DATE     : 2nd JANUARY, 2026

                      P.C. :-


                      1.            This matter was heard for some time.

                      2.            The learned Advocate for the Petitioner sought a pass

                      over.

                      3.            When this matter was called out at end of the board, as

                      a pass over matter, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits,

                      on instructions from the Petitioner, that the Petitioner desires to

                      withdraw the Petition and that, if so advised or if circumstances so

                      arise, an Election Petition would be filed.

                      Trupti                            1 of 2
                                                             1-wp-2-2-26.odt




4.           In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed off

as withdrawn, on instructions, with liberty. All contentions of all the

stakeholders are kept open.




                                      (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
                                         (VACATION COURT)




Trupti                            2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.