Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AZEEM JAGANIversusNADIA KAZI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it.

Summary

Vaishali Anil filed Writ Petition No. 200 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court against Tikam and Nadia Kazi seeking unspecified relief. The petitioner, through counsel Gayatri Gokhale and Sneha Jethwa, later requested leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the parties, granted the leave to withdraw and ordered the writ petition to be dismissed and disposed of. A separate contempt petition (No. 436 of 2023) was also listed, and the matter was adjourned to 29 September 2026. No substantive merits of the original relief were addressed as the petition was withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal of petition
  • contempt proceedings

Judgment

                                                                                73-WP-200-2023 (C).doc

                   Tikam

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 200 OF 2023

VAISHALI               Azeem Jagani                                              ...Petitioner/s
ANIL                   VERSUS
TIKAM
                       Nadia Kazi                                                ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
                                                     WITH
2026.09.07
13:48:59 +0530                          CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 436 OF 2023

                       Azeem Jagani                                              ...Petitioner/s
                       VERSUS
                       Nadia Kazi                                                ...Respondent/s

                       _________________________________________________________________

                       Ms. Gayatri Gokhale a/w. Sneha Jethwa, Advocate for Petitioner in WP
                       200/2023.
                       Mr. Samarth Morey (VC) i/by Ms. Shivani Shinde, for Respondent.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                           CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                           DATE        :   2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.         Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner in WP and Respondent.

                       2.         Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave

                       to withdraw the petition.

                       3.         Considering      the submission of learned counsel for the

                       Petitioner in WP, leave granted. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

                       4.         Writ Petition is dismissed and disposed of.

                                                          ****




                                                       Page 1 of 2
                                                         73-WP-200-2023 (C).doc

Tikam

    In Contempt Petition No. 436 of 2023.

    1.        Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent.

    2.        Stand over to 29/09/2026.




                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                   Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.