Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AJAY KUMARversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition, allowing the petitioner to seek an alternate remedy under the BNSS.

Summary

Ajay Kumar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking the return of his property, alleging that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the State were responsible for its seizure. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition and instead pursue an alternative remedy under the provisions of the BNSS for the property's return. The Court examined whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the writ and seek another statutory remedy. It held that the petitioner was entitled to withdraw the petition, provided he was given liberty to approach the appropriate forum under the BNSS. Accordingly, the Court granted leave to withdraw the petition with the specified liberty. The petition was thereafter disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a writ petition and pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS for the return of property.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • alternate remedy
  • BNSS
  • property return
  • Bombay High Court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                         DTG                                                          19-Wp-2001-2026.doc



                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 2001 OF 2026

                         Ajay Kumar                                                 … Petitioner
                                  V/s.
                         The Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr                  … Respondents
                                            _______________________________________

                         Mr. Aditya Talpade a/w Mr. Prajwal Padole i/b Mr. Pratik Karande for the
                         Petitioner.

                         Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Ms. Yukta Sawant, Mr. Sumitkumar Nimbalkar and Mr.
                         Anay Joshi for Respondent No.1-C.B.I.

                         Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
                                          _______________________________________

                                                     CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                     DATE  : 1st September 2026

                         P.C. :

                         1)              Learned counsel for Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to

                         withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy under the provisions

                         of the BNSS, for return of the property.

                         1.1)            Leave and liberty granted.

                         2)              Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.




                                         ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM   TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.09.08
            15:18:30 +0530
                                                                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.