Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAHESH SINGH JATversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail an alternate remedy under the BNSS.

Summary

Mahesh Singh Jat filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking the return of property, alleging that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the State were involved. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS for the property’s return. The Court examined whether such a withdrawal with liberty to seek another remedy was permissible. It granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal and affirming the liberty to approach the appropriate forum under the BNSS. Consequently, the petition was formally disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a writ petition while retaining the liberty to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS.

Subjects

  • petition withdrawal
  • alternate remedy
  • BNSS
  • property return
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                  DTG                                                                20-Wp-2002-2026.doc



                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 2002 OF 2026

                  Mahesh Singh Jat                                                 … Petitioner
                                 V/s.
                  The Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr                        … Respondents
                                           _______________________________________

                  Mr. Aditya Talpade a/w Mr. Prajwal Padole i/b Mr. Pratik Karande for the
                  Petitioner.

                  Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Ms. Yukta Sawant, Mr. Sumitkumar Nimbalkar and Mr.
                  Anay Joshi for Respondent No.1-C.B.I.

                  Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
                                    _______________________________________

                                                    CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                    DATE  : 1st September 2026

                  P.C. :

                  1)                    Learned counsel for Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to

                  withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy under the provisions

                  of the BNSS, for return of the property.

                  1.1)                  Leave and liberty granted.

                  2)                    Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.




                                        ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
              Digitally signed
              by
DNYANESHWAR   DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM     TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR       GHUMNAR
              Date: 2026.09.08
              15:20:33 +0530                                                                               1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.