Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LOKESH KUMAR MEENAversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue an alternate remedy under the BNSS.

Summary

Lokesh Kumar Meena filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Central Bureau of Investigation and the State, seeking the return of property. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition and to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS. The Court examined whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. It granted leave to withdraw and expressly allowed the petitioner to seek the alternate remedy. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn and the pending interim application was also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and avail an alternate remedy under the BNSS

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • alternate remedy
  • BNSS
  • C.B.I.
  • property

Judgment

                               DTG                                                       23-Wp-2005-2026.doc



                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 2005 OF 2026
                                                                 WITH
                                               INTERIM APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 12614 OF 2026

                               Lokesh Kumar Meena                                … Petitioner
                                    V/s.
                               The Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr.        … Respondents
                                              _______________________________________

                               Mr. Aditya Talpade a/w Mr. Prajwal Padole i/b Mr. Pratik Karande for the
                               Petitioner.

                               Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Ms. Yukta Sawant, Mr. Sumitkumar Nimbalkar and Mr.
                               Anay Joshi for Respondent No.1-C.B.I.

                               Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
                                             _______________________________________
                                                     CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                    KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                     DATE         : 1st September 2026
                               P.C. :

                               1)          Learned counsel for Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to

                               withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy under the provisions

                               of the BNSS, for return of the property.

                               1.1)        Leave and liberty granted.

                               2)          Petition is disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

                               3)          In view of disposal of Petition, Interim Application (ST.)

                               No.12614 of 2026 pending therein, does not survive and is accordingly

                               disposed off.


                                           ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                   ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR
            TULSHIRAM
            GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.09.08
                                                                                                               1/1
            15:21:38 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.