Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BIKASH KUMAR SINGHversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ACB, MUMBAI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

A petitioner may be allowed to withdraw a writ petition if the Court is satisfied that an alternative remedy is available, and liberty may be granted to pursue that remedy.

Summary

The petitioner, Bikesh Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Central Bureau of Investigation and the State. The petitioner later moved the Court for permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS for the return of property. The Court examined whether a petitioner may be allowed to withdraw a writ petition and simultaneously be granted liberty to approach another forum. It held that a petitioner can be permitted to withdraw the petition provided the Court is satisfied that an alternative remedy exists. Accordingly, the Court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy. The petition was then disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a writ petition and be granted liberty to pursue an alternative remedy under the BNSS

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • alternate remedy
  • BNSS
  • high court procedure
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                               DTG                                                          24-Wp-2006-2026.doc



                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 2006 OF 2026


                               Bikesh Kumar Singh                                         … Petitioner
                                        V/s.
                               The Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr                  … Respondents
                                                  _______________________________________

                               Mr. Aditya Talpade a/w Mr. Prajwal Padole i/b Mr. Pratik Karande for the
                               Petitioner.

                               Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Ms. Yukta Sawant, Mr. Sumitkumar Nimbalkar and Mr.
                               Anay Joshi for Respondent No.1-C.B.I.

                               Mr. Ajay S. Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
                                                 _______________________________________

                                                           CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                   KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE  : 1st September 2026

                               P.C. :

                               1)              Learned counsel for Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to

                               withdraw Petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy under the provisions

                               of the BNSS, for return of the property.

                               1.1)            Leave and liberty granted.

                               2)              Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.




                                               ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR
            TULSHIRAM
            GHUMNAR
                                                                                                                  1/1
            Date: 2026.09.08
            15:21:53 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.