Bombay High Court

KADU NARAYAN PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the loan liability was already satisfied.

Summary

Petitioner Kadu Narayan Patil filed a writ petition challenging the loan liability alleged against him by the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner sought relief, presumably to contest the liability or its enforcement. Respondent No.3, through counsel, submitted a statement that the entire loan liability had already been paid. The court accepted this statement as conclusive. Consequently, the writ petition was deemed infructuous and was disposed of without further adjudication. No substantive legal questions were addressed beyond the procedural disposal.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition remains maintainable when the loan liability alleged against the petitioner has been fully paid.

Subjects

loan liability
writ petition
infructuous
disposal
court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42522

                                                                                                                                               901. WP 2007 of 2019.odt
                                                                                                  1

                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                                               WRIT PETITION NO.2007/2019

                                                                  Kadu Narayan Patil
                                                                       ...Versus…
                                                          The State of Maharashtra and others

         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -
        Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                                                                             Court's or Judge's orders
        appearances, Court's orders or directions
        and Registrar's orders
        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -
                                                                                 Mr. Shaikh Mohd. Naseer, Advocate for petitioner
                                                                                 Mr. S.K. Shirse, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 5
                                                                                 Mr. Thoke Patil, Advocate for respondent No.3

                                                                                                CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
                                                                                                DATE : 16/09/2026

                                              1.                            Learned Advocate for the respondent No.3, on
                                              instructions, makes a statement that the entire loan liability is
                                              already paid.
                                              2.                            Accepting the statement made, Writ Petition is
                                              disposed off as infructuous.




                                                                                                                                   (ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.)


                    Gawade

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…