Bombay High Court
KISANRAO @ NANASAHEB CHABURAO DESHMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHA and ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Kisanrao, filed a writ petition (No. 2029 of 2003) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for many years, and by the time of hearing on 28 September 2026, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. The court considered this submission and found no merit in proceeding with a petition that had become stale. No substantive issues on the merits were addressed. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition as infructuous, effectively dismissing it without further order.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition pending for an extended period can be considered infructuous and thus dismissed?
Subjects
- writ petition
- limitation
- infructuous
- High Court
- petition dismissed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44705
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2029 OF 2003
Kisanrao @ Nanasaheb s/o Chaburao Deshmukh … PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors. … RESPONDENTS
.......
Me. D.S. Bhapkar, Advocate holding for
Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. V.M. Jawre, A.G.P. for State
....…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits
that, by passage of time, the present petition is rendered infructuous. As
such, the petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…