Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAHUL JITENDRA MEHTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that, in view of the complainant's consent affidavit and the absence of any impediment, the FIR and chargesheet must be quashed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Jitendra Mehta, filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 391/2024 and Chargesheet No. 13/2025 filed against him and his wife. The FIR and chargesheet were registered under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, provisions of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 and the Arms Act, 1959. The wife, who was the complainant, submitted a consent affidavit stating that the incident arose from matrimonial discord and that she no longer wished to pursue the case. The Court examined the affidavit, interacted with both parties, and found no impediment to granting relief. Relying on the consent of the complainant and the provisions of Section 528, the Court quashed the FIR and chargesheet and disposed of the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the FIR and chargesheet can be quashed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to prevent abuse of the process of law.
  • Whether the consent affidavit of the complainant (wife) suffices to justify quashing the criminal proceedings.
  • Whether any legal impediment exists to entertain the petition for quash.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • quash of FIR
  • section 528
  • abuse of process
  • marital dispute
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bombay Police Act
  • Arms Act

Judgment

                                                                       70. CRI WP-2029-26.odt


Amberkar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                               WRIT PETITION NO. 2029 OF 2026

           Rahul Jitendra Mehta                                      .. Petitioner
                      Versus
           State of Maharashtra & Anr.                               .. Respondents
                                     ....................
            Mr. Sudeeph Pasbola a/w Mr. Vivek Thakare, Mr. Chinmay Godse &
             Mr. Rajan Gurnani i/by Mr. Suraj Chakor, Advocates for Petitioner
            Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for State
            Mr. Himanshu Patil a/w Ms. Jagruti Nimbalkar, Advocates for
             Respondent No. 2
                                           ...................
                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                          DATE          : AUGUST 31, 2026
           P. C.:

           1.       Heard Mr. Pasbola, learned Advocate for Petitioner; Mr. Nakhwa,

           learned APP for State and Mr. Patil, learned Advocate for Respondent

           No. 2.


           2.       Present Petition is filed under the provisions of Section 528 of

           the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short "BNSS")

           seeking to quash and set aside F.I.R. No. 391/2024 and Chargesheet

           No. 13/2025 registered with Mira Bhayander Police Station on dated

           20.12.2024 under Section 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023,

           Section 37(1) & (3), 135 of The Bombay Police Act, 1951 and Section

           4 & 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.




                                                                                       1 of 2
                                                                                      70. CRI WP-2029-26.odt


           3.       Parties before the court are husband and wife. Consent affidavit

           dated 02.04.2026 is filed by Respondent No. 2 - wife who is the

           complainant.                     It prima facie states that due to some matrimonial

           discord, the incident has occurred. Said consent affidavit is filed giving

           all necessary details. I have perused the same. I have interacted with

           both the parties who are present before the Court.


           4.       In view of the above, there can be no impediment in allowing

           the present Petition. Hence, Petition stands allowed in terms of prayer

           clause (a) which reads thus:-

                    "a)                 That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside F.I.R. No.
                                        391/2024 and Chargesheet No. 13/2025 registered with Mira
                                        Bhayander Police Station on dated 20.12.2024 under Section 109(1)
                                        of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 37(1) & (3), 135 of The
                                        Bombay Police Act, 1951 and Section 4 & 25 of the Arms Act, 1959
                                        as filed against the present Petitioners under article 226 of the
                                        Constitution of India along read with section 528 of the Bharatiya
                                        Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 to prevent the abuse of the process of law and
                                        to secure the end of justice;


           5.       Petition is allowed and disposed.




Amberkar                                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                     Digitally signed
                     by RAVINDRA
           RAVINDRA MOHAN
           MOHAN    AMBERKAR
           AMBERKAR Date:
                     2026.09.01
                     20:29:39 +0530




                                                                                                      2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.