Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANITA VILAS RAUTversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 2 ORS

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non‑appearance.

Summary

Anita Vilas Raut filed a writ petition (No. 2055 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and others. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates of 6 May 2026 and 6 July 2026. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner either. The court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was recorded on 11 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • non‑appearance

Judgment

                                                                                24-WP-2055-2017.odt


           rajshree


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                                 WRIT PETITION NO.2055 OF 2017


                             Anita Vilas Raut                                ....Petitioner
                                           V/S
                             MCGM & Ors.                                     ....Respondents


                             None for the Petitioner.
                             Ms.Shweta Patankar i/b Ms.Komal Punjabi for MCGM.


                                                       CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE &
                                                               ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ

                                                       DATE    : 11th AUGUST 2026


                             P.C. :

                             1        None for the Petitioner.       Even on 06/05/2026 and
                             06/07/2026 there was no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner.


                             2        In the wake of above, Writ Petition stand dismissed for want
                             of prosecution.




                             [ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.]                     [BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

          Digitally signed
          by RAJSHREE
RAJSHREE KISHOR MORE
KISHOR   Date:
MORE     2026.08.12
         10:04:49
          +0530




                                                                                               1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.