Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AKHTAR HASAN RIZVIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is disposed of as infructuous because the cause of action no longer survives.

Summary

The petitioner, Akhtar Hasan Rizvi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that subsequent events had eliminated the cause of action for the petition. The court examined the submission and found that the petition no longer had any substantive ground. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the case were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition remains maintainable in view of subsequent events that extinguish the cause of action

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • cause of action
  • disposal

Judgment

TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE

Digitally signed
by TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
                            TSB                                                  3-wp-2088-2026.doc
Date: 2026.10.05
11:17:02 +0530



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 2088 OF 2026

                   Akhtar Hasan Rizvi                                              … Petitioner

                            V/s.

                   The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                 … Respondents



                   Mr. Mahesh Mishra a/w. Mr. Shafiquddin Siddique for the Petitioner.
                   Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State.




                                                         CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                  KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE : 29th September, 2026

                   P.C.:-

                   1)                Learned Advocate for the Petitioner on instructions submitted

                   that, due to subsequent events the cause of action for filing of present

                   Petition does not survive.

                   2)              Petition is accordingly disposed off as infructuous.



                                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                                                      1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.