Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANDIP KAILAS BHISE AND ORSversusASHWINI SANDIP BHISE AND ORS

Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners failed to appear before the Court on multiple occasions when the matter was called for hearing on 11 June 2026 and 25 June 2026. The Court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Mehroz K. Pathan.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioners do not appear before the Court

Subjects

  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • criminal writ petition
  • non-appearance

Judgment

                                                             7 CRI. WP NO. 209 OF 2026



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 209 OF 2026

                         Sandip Kailas Bhise And Ors.
                                    VERSUS
                        Ashwini Sandip Bhise And Ors.
                                      …
       •   None for the Petitioners
       •   Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent No. 3 - State
                                      …
                                     CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J.

                                     DATED : 25.06.2026

PER COURT :

1.         Nobody appeared when the matter was called out on

11.06.2026. Hence, the matter was kept for dismissal on 25.06.2026.

2.         Today, in the morning session, when the matter was called out,

none appeared on behalf of the Petitioners. Hence, the matter was

kept back in the afternoon session. In the afternoon session, when the

matter was again called out, neither the Petitioners nor their learned

Advocate appeared.

3.         It appears that the Petitioners are not interested in prosecuting

the present Petition.

4.         The Petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                             ( MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. )


Jhs/                                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.