Bombay High Court

SHAHELA FATEMA MOHAMMAD ISHAQversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the interim arrangement shall continue for six weeks from the date of the order.

Summary

Several writ petitions were filed by different petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court had earlier disposed of these petitions on 2 September 2026. The petitioners sought clarification that the interim arrangement ordered in similar cases should continue. The Court, noting the practice in analogous matters, directed that the interim arrangement be continued for six weeks from the date of the order. It ordered the court office to incorporate this sentence into the original order and to upload a fresh order.

Issues considered

Whether the interim arrangement ordered in the disposed writ petitions should be continued for a specified period

Subjects

writ petition
interim arrangement
order modification
High Court
speaking to minutes

Judgment

      This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //




                                                (1)               wp607.20


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         7 WRIT PETITION NO. 607 OF 2020
                      TAHENIYAT BANU ABDUL HAFIZ SHATTARI
                                     VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

                        8 WRIT PETITION NO. 1560 OF 2020
                         MUKHTDIR ABDUL HAFIZ SATTARI
                                     VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

                        9 WRIT PETITION NO. 2097 OF 2021
                       SHAHELA FATEMA MOHAMMAD ISHAQ
                                     VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

                         WRIT PETITION NO. 2027 OF 2021
                            SHRIKANT SUHAS PAWARA
                                     VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                      AND
                         WRIT PETITION NO. 3217 OF 2022
                            ABHAY ABASAHEB SHINDE
                                     VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Mr. S.B. Kendre h/f. Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar and Mr. R.S. Wani, AGPs for the respondent-State.

                                          CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
                                                  JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
                                          DATE  : 07.09.2026
PC :-

01.            Not on Board. Taken on Board.



02.            Preacipe is moved for speaking to minutes of the order dated

02.09.2026.
        This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //




                                                  (2)                     wp607.20




03.                By way of order dated 02.09.2026, this Court disposed off

the Writ Petitions. Though in other similar matters, interim arrangement

is directed to continue for a period of six weeks, such order is remained

to be passed in the present petitions. Considering the same, following

sentence be added in the order dated 02.09.2026.

                   “Interim arrangement to continue for a period of 6 (six)
                   weeks from the date of the order.”

04.                Office to carry out said addition in the order and fresh order

be uploaded.




         [JITENDRA JAIN, J.]                                 [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
snk/2026/Sep26/wp607.20

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…