Bombay High Court

SEVA CO-OP HSG SOC AND 23 ORSversusRELIANCE ENTERPRISES AND 8 ORS

Decided: 19 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition and ordered the petition to stand disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners, Seva Co‑op Hsg. Soc. and 23 others, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the respondents. They later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition and, if necessary, to make representations to the concerned authority. The Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal of the petition without examining the merits of the substantive claims. It expressly kept open the liberty for the petitioners to file a fresh petition in the future. Consequently, the Court ordered that the writ petition stand disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition
Whether the petitioners retain liberty to file a fresh petition thereafter

Subjects

withdrawal of writ petition
procedural order
liberty to file fresh petition
high court disposition

Judgment

                                                                33. WP 2099-2019.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO.2099 OF 2019

Seva Co-op Hsg. Soc. And 23 Ors.       …. Petitioners
         Versus
Reliance Enterprises And Ors.          …     Respondents
                                 …..
Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners.
Adv. Shivani Samel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Anoop Patil a/w Mr. Darpan Gupta and Ms. Kasturi Marathe for
Respondent Nos.6 and 7-SRA.
Smt. Gauri Sawant, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
                                 …..
                             CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                     SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                   DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026
P.C.

1.           The learned Counsel for the Petitioners fairly submits that

they may be permitted to withdraw the Petition, with liberty to the

Petitioners to make representation to the Authority, if necessary.


2.         It is made clear that we have not examined the contentions

raised in the Writ Petition on merits and all the contentions of the

parties are kept open.


3.        Liberty to file a fresh Petition is also kept open.


RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                              1/2
                                                         33. WP 2099-2019.doc

4.        The Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                            (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                       2/2
               Digitally signed
 RAJESH    by RAJESH
           VASANT
 VASANT    CHITTEWAN
 CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.08.20
               19:30:51 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.