Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHAMMAD ASHRAF SHAKIR ALI SHAH AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was withdrawn with leave to file a fresh petition later.

Summary

The petitioners, Mohammad Ashraf Shakir Ali Shah and others, filed a writ petition (No. 2165 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was argued before Justice Milind N. Jadhav. During the hearing, the Court expressed reluctance to entertain the petition. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Prem Kumar Pandey, requested permission to withdraw the petition and indicated a possible fresh filing later. The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty for a future petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedural discretion

Judgment

                                                                                 73. CRI WP-2165-2026.odt


    Amberkar

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 2165 OF 2026

               Mohammad Ashraf Shakir Ali Shah & Ors.           .. Petitioners
                          Versus
               State of Maharashtra & Anr.                      .. Respondents
                                           ....................
                Mr. Prem Kumar Pandey a/w Mr. Pavan Pandy, Ms. Sneha Mishra,
                  Ms. Kajal Mishra & Mr. Devendra Agrawal, Addvocates for
                  Applicant
                Mr. Amil A. Palkar, APP for State
                Mr. Nitin Narale, PSI, Boisar Police Station
                                                       ...................
                                                      CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                      DATE          : AUGUST 31, 2026
               P. C.:

               1.       Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Advocate for Petitioners and learned

               APP for State.


               2.       After this Court expressed its disinclination to allow the present

               Petition, Mr. Pandey persuades the Court to allow him to withdraw

               the present Petition with leave and liberty to file a fresh Petition later

               on. In view thereof, reserving the said liberty, Petition is disposed as

               withdrawn.


Amberkar                                                           [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                         Digitally signed
                         by RAVINDRA
               RAVINDRA MOHAN
               MOHAN    AMBERKAR
               AMBERKAR Date:
                         2026.09.01
                         20:28:38 +0530




                                                                                                   1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.