Bombay High Court
NILESH VIKRAM GAVAD AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Summary
The Court observed that the costs ordered on 20 August 2026 have been paid and that order has been complied with. Accordingly, it held that no further orders were required and closed the proceedings without addressing any substantive issues.
Judgment
15.WP.2198.2024+.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT
(P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2198 OF 2024
Nilesh Vikram Gavad and Ors. .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4145OF 2026
Sachin Pralhad Gavai and Ors. .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
....................
Mr. Prashant Pandey a/w. Mr. Dinesh Jadhwani and Ms. Ridhima
Mangovkar, Advocates i/by W3Legal LLP for Petitioners.
Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
Mr. Tushar N. Halwai, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : AUGUST 27, 2026
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Mr.
Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Halwai,
learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.
2. As informed by learned Advocates, costs have been paid as
directed vide order dated 20.08.2026 and the same order stands
complied with.
3. Hence no further orders are required to be passed.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
1 of 1
Digitally signed by
HARSHADA HARSHADA
HANUMANT
HANUMANT SAWANT
SAWANT Date: 2026.08.27
14:53:57 +0530
Checking your session…