Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NILESH VIKRAM GAVAD AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Summary

The Court observed that the costs ordered on 20 August 2026 have been paid and that order has been complied with. Accordingly, it held that no further orders were required and closed the proceedings without addressing any substantive issues.

Judgment

                                                                                           15.WP.2198.2024+.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                                  WRIT PETITION NO.2198 OF 2024

                    Nilesh Vikram Gavad and Ors.                                       .. Petitioners
                               Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                                  .. Respondents

                                                              WITH
                                                  WRIT PETITION NO.4145OF 2026

                    Sachin Pralhad Gavai and Ors.                    .. Petitioners
                               Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                .. Respondents
                                                ....................
                     Mr. Prashant Pandey a/w. Mr. Dinesh Jadhwani and Ms. Ridhima
                       Mangovkar, Advocates i/by W3Legal LLP for Petitioners.
                     Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
                     Mr. Tushar N. Halwai, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                                                             ...................

                                                            CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                            DATE          : AUGUST 27, 2026
                    P.C.:

                    1.           Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Advocate for Petitioners;                      Mr.

                    Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Halwai,

                    learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.


                    2.           As informed by learned Advocates, costs have been paid as

                    directed vide order dated 20.08.2026 and the same order stands

                    complied with.


                    3.           Hence no further orders are required to be passed.



H. H. SAWANT                                                                 [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                                                                                                         1 of 1
                            Digitally signed by
                 HARSHADA   HARSHADA
                            HANUMANT
                 HANUMANT   SAWANT
                 SAWANT     Date: 2026.08.27
                            14:53:57 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.