Bombay High Court

SALIM GULABSAHEB SHAIKHversusTHE CHAIRMAN OF NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MISSION @ THE CHIEF EXEUCTIVE OFFICER AND ANR.

Disposal: Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn on the petitioner's request and granted leave to do so.

Summary

The petitioner, Salim Gulabsaheb Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Chairman of the National Rural Health Mission. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a communication on 24 September 2026 seeking the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, without addressing the merits of the original petition, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was formally withdrawn by the petitioner. The Court entered an order disposing of the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
civil procedure
high court

Judgment

                                                       10 - WP - 2204 - 2008.docx


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                  WRIT PETITION NO. 2204 OF 2008

Salim Gulabsaheb Shaikh                         … Petitioner
           V/s.
The Chairman of National Rural Health
Mission @ The Chief Exeuctive Officer &
Anr.                                            … Respondents

Adv. Sharad Bhosale, for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.

                                CORAM       : RAJESH S. PATIL, &
                                              ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

                                DATED       : OCTOBER 5, 2026
P.C.:
1.      Mr. Sharad Bhosale, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

has tendered a communication dated 24 September 2026 addressed by

the petitioner to the Advocate on Record appearing for him. The said

letter is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification purpose.


2.      In view of the said communication dated 24 September 2026, the

learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave of this

Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.


3.      Leave, as prayed for, is granted.


4.      Hence, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.




 ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. )                          ( RAJESH S. PATIL, J. )



Rushi                                                                          1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…