Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH DILBER HUSSAIN MOHD SHAFIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition was dismissed.

Summary

Shaikh Dilber Hussain Mohd. Shafi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was argued by Senior Advocate Mr. A. S. Khandeparkar and Mr. Farhan Shaikh, while the State was represented by Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar. The Court heard the parties and, citing a lack of time and other roster matters, indicated that detailed reasons for its decision would be provided later. No substantive discussion of the merits was recorded in the judgment. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                       50.WP.223.2026.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                             WRIT PETITION NO.223 OF 2026

                    Shaikh Dilber Hussain Mohd. Shafi                 .. Petitioner
                               Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra                          .. Respondent
                                                 ....................
                     Mr. A. S. Khandeparkar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Farhan Shaikh,
                       Advocates for Petitioner.
                     Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for Respondent – State.
                                                         ...................

                                                        CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                        DATE          : AUGUST 27, 2026
                    P.C.:

                    1.               Heard Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Advocate for Petitioner

                    and Ms. Talhar, learned APP for Respondent – State.


                    2.               After hearing the parties threadbare and perusing the

                    citations referred to and relied upon by Petitioner, due to paucity of

                    time and roster matters of this Court, the reasons for dismissal of the

                    present Petition shall be given later.


                    3.               Writ Petition stands dismissed accordingly.




H. H. SAWANT                                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                               Digitally
                               signed by
                               HARSHADA
                    HARSHADA   HANUMANT
                    HANUMANT   SAWANT
                    SAWANT     Date:
                               2026.08.28
                               11:33:20
                               +0530




                                                                                                  1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.