Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KALA RANI PERISAMI DEVENDRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

Kala Rani Perisami Devendra filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after February 18, 2021, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on August 29, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                    19-wp237.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 237 OF 2021

            Kala Rani Perisami Devendra                                …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                   …..Respondents
                            ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. Ajay Patil APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, after 18 th February 2021, neither the

            Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

            even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                         1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:06 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.