Bombay High Court
SHAIKH HAMID PEERMOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Shaikh Hamid PeerMohammad, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. After filing, the petitioner neither secured the removal of office objections nor obtained any circulation of the petition. The court observed that these procedural steps were essential to advance the matter. Consequently, the judges inferred that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the case. The petition was therefore dismissed for non prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal writ petition should be entertained despite the petitioner’s failure to remove office objections and obtain circulation
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- non prosecution
- dismissal
- High Court
- Bombay
Judgment
(1)
919- Cri. W. P. 243-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 243 OF 2021
SHAIKH HAMID PEERMOHAMMAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
…..
APP for Respondents: Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale
.....
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2026
ORDER:-
1. None for the petitioner.
2. Neither office objections are removed nor the petitioner had
obtained any circulation, after filing this petition. Thus, it appears
that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter and it
stands dismissed for non prosecution.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
YSK/
Checking your session…