Bombay High Court

Sharda Cropchem LimitedversusTHE UNION OF INDIA

Decided: 5 October 2026
Disposal: Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court held that the writ petition may be withdrawn and disposed of.

Summary

Sharda Cropchem Limited filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and others. After a subsequent order from the Competent Authority was rendered in the petitioner's favour, the petitioner moved the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioners were represented by Adv. Bharat Raichandani, Adv. Mahesh Raichandani and Adv. Bhagrati Sahu of UBR Legal Advocates. The respondents, the State, were represented by Smt. Shruti D. Vyas and Smt. P. J. Gavhane, AGP. The Court considered whether a petition already partially decided could be withdrawn. It allowed the withdrawal and ordered the petition to be disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn after a favourable order from the Competent Authority

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
civil appellate jurisdiction
High Court
competent authority

Judgment

  2026:BHC-AS:40340-DB


                              Bhogale                                                  46.wp-2442-2026.doc



                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO.2442 OF 2026

                           Sharda Cropchem Limited                      … Petitioner
                                Versus
                           Union of India and ors.                      .… Respondents

                                                         ****
                           Adv. Bharat Raichandani a/w Adv. Mahesh Raichandani,
                           Adv. Bhagrati Sahu i/b. UBR Legal Advocates, for the petitioner.
                           Smt. Shruti D. Vyas, Addl.G.P. a/w Smt. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for
                           the respondent-State.
                                                         ****
                                                       CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                                                  SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                                              DATE :    5th OCTOBER 2026

                           P.C. :

                           1.            In view of the subsequent events and the order passed by

                           the Competent Authority in favour of the petitioner, learned

                           counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw

                           the writ petition.

                           2.            The writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and

                           disposed of accordingly.




                           (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                             (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Signed by: Pradnya Bhogale
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 05/10/2026 17:49:51                                    1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.