Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANTOSH KUNDANLALJAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

All the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

A large group of writ petitions (numbers 1537‑2479 of 2008) were filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief but did not specify substantive grounds in the excerpt. Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ajay Deshpande and Mr. C.C. Deshpande (h/f Mr. C.R. Deshpande), submitted that the matters had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, found no cause to proceed and ordered the petitions to be disposed of as infructuous. Consequently, all the writ petitions were dismissed without any further hearing. The judgment was delivered by Justice Abhay S. Waghwase on June 12, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petitions are infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • Bombay High Court
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:23154


                                                    934-WP-2478-2008+group.odt




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         934 WRIT PETITION NO. 2478 OF 2008

                          DEEPAK NANASAHEB CHOUDHARY
                                      VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                                       WITH
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 1538 OF 2008

                           PADMAKAR TUKARAM KAPADNIS
                                      VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                                       WITH
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 2474 OF 2008

                          CHAMPABAI UKCHAND BHANSALI
                                      VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                                       WITH
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 1539 OF 2008

                                ANIL TUKARAM WANI
                                      VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                                       WITH
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 1632 OF 2008

                              VASANT MADHAV KAPURE
                                      VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS




                                                                        1 of 7
                (( 2 ))    934-WP-2478-2008+group




              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2469 OF 2008

   PANDURANG NIMBA DESHMUKH
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2470 OF 2008
    SHAIKH AYUB SHAIKH DADAN
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2471 OF 2008

    KANTABAI SHANKAR MARATHE
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2460 OF 2008

      RAMESH RAMBHAU MORE
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2461 OF 2008

  SUBHASH MAHADULAL AGARWAL
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2462 OF 2008

    MARUTI VITHOBA CHOUGULE
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                                                    2 of 7
                (( 3 ))    934-WP-2478-2008+group




              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2466 OF 2008

   PANDHARINATH DAYARAM WANI
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2480 OF 2008
  SHAIKH DILAWAR SHAIKH AHEMAD
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2463 OF 2008
     JAGANNATH SHAMRAO PATIL
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 1537 OF 2008
 M/S SWAMI SAMARTHA ENTERPRISES
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 1633 OF 2008
     RAJANI BALKRISHNA MORE
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2476 OF 2008

      SANTOSH KUNDANLALJAIN
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                                                    3 of 7
                (( 4 ))    934-WP-2478-2008+group




              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2473 OF 2008
SHAIKH JAHEDABEE SHAIKH MUSTAKIM
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2464 OF 2008
      TUKARAM GANPAT RENOSE
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2475 OF 2008
   RASHID BAIG MAHBOOB MIRZA
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2477 OF 2008
      PRASHANT LOTAN SANER
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2456 OF 2008
 MAHILA SAHAKARI GRAHAK BHANDAR
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2457 OF 2008
     M/S SITARAM ENTERPRISES
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS



                                                    4 of 7
                (( 5 ))    934-WP-2478-2008+group




              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2472 OF 2008

     MALAK IQBAL MALAK VAJIR
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2458 OF 2008

        VIJAY NAGINDAS JAIN
               VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2459 OF 2008

       SUMAN MANGA SONAR
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2465 OF 2008
       SHAKUNTALA WALJI JAIN
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 1635 OF 2008

       SATISH RAMAN DUSANE
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

              WITH
  WRIT PETITION NO. 2467 OF 2008
      MANGESH HARLAL PAWAR
              VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS


                                                    5 of 7
                    (( 6 ))    934-WP-2478-2008+group




                  WITH
      WRIT PETITION NO. 2468 OF 2008
       ANANDA SHRAVAN CHOUDHARI
                  VERSUS
    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                  WITH
      WRIT PETITION NO. 1636 OF 2008

          RAJENDRA NAGO DUSANE
                  VERSUS
    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                  WITH
      WRIT PETITION NO. 2455 OF 2008

       DATTATATRAY DHONDIRAM PATIL
                  VERSUS
    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                  WITH
      WRIT PETITION NO. 2481 OF 2008

SHAILA MAGASVARGIYA MAHILA SANSTHA DHULE
                  VERSUS
    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                  WITH
      WRIT PETITION NO. 2479 OF 2008

            NANDU JAIRAM BARI
                  VERSUS
    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                  WITH
      WRIT PETITION NO. 1634 OF 2008

          MADHUKAR HARI SALVE
                 VERSUS
   THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

                                                        6 of 7
                                    (( 7 ))   934-WP-2478-2008+group




                                    .…
Mr. Ajay Deshpande, Advocate for Petitioners in respective petitions
Mr. C. C. Deshpande h/f Mr. C. R. Deshpande, Advocate for
Petitioners in respective petitions
Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
                                    .…

                    CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                       DATE : June 12, 2026
PER COURT :-


1.          Learned counsel Mr. Deshpande submits that these

matters have become infructuous.



2.          In view of the above submission, all these writ petitions

stand disposed of as infructuous.



                                     [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]

SMS




                                                                       7 of 7


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.