Bombay High Court
MANDAR MADHUKAR PATOLE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed as Withdrawn
Holding
The writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioners and consequently dismissed.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of domestic violence (D.V.) proceedings (C.C. No.540/DV/2025) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and prayed for various protection and monetary reliefs. The petition alleged serious domestic abuse, including the forcible removal of the respondent's mangalsutra. The High Court, after reviewing the D.V. proceedings, expressed disinclination to entertain the writ and indicated that it would be dismissed with heavy costs. The petitioners, through their counsel, subsequently instructed the court to withdraw the writ petition. The court recorded the withdrawal instruction, allowed the petition to be withdrawn, and dismissed it accordingly.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of the domestic violence proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 should be entertained.
Legislation cited
- Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 12, 18(a), 18(b), 18(c), 19(f), 20, 22, 23
Subjects
- Domestic Violence
- Protection Order
- Writ Petition
- Quashing of Proceedings
- Withdrawal
- Costs
Judgment
908-WP-2499-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2499 OF 2026
Mandar Madhukar Patole & Anr. …Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Shailesh Chavan, appointed through Legal Aid, for the
Petitioners.
Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP, for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 11th SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-
1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and
learned APP appearing for Respondent No.1-State.
2. By this Writ Petition, the relief sought is seeking quashing of
D.V. proceedings bearing C.C. No.540/DV/2025 pending before the
learned Judicial Magistrate First Class 67 th Court, Metropolitan
Magistrate, Borivali, Mumbai filed under the provisions of Section
12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
In the said proceedings, the following reliefs are sought:
Page 1
Sonali
908-WP-2499-2026.DOC
“a. This Hon'ble Court takes Cognizance of the
Application and pass all/any of the order as may
be expedient in the circumstances of the case.
b. To pass an Order for the Protection of the
Applicant Prohibiting all the Respondents from
committing any act of Domestic Violence or
aiding and abetting the same U/s 18 (a) and (b)
of the Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005;
c. The Respondents be restrained by a permanent
order and injunction from entering the place of
residence of the Applicant under section 18 (c) of
the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence
Act, 2005;
d. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass an
Order for the Residence of the Applicant U/s 19
(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 as may be expedient in the
circumstances of the case. The Respondent No. 1
be ordered and directed to provide same level
self-contained accommodation to the Applicant
comprising of 1 bed room, hall kitchen and bath
within Mumbai near Malad East Mumbai or in
the alternative provide a similar Rental Premises
to the Applicant in accordance with the income
and standard of living of the Respondent No. 1
and at the same level as enjoyed by the Applicant
in the shared household and/or to pay rent of Rs.
30,000/- for the same
e. To pass an Order for the Monetary relief to the
Applicant directing the Respondent No. 1 to
provide an amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty
Thousand Only) per month towards the
maintenance to the Applicant for meeting the
Page 2
Sonali
908-WP-2499-2026.DOC
necessary/personal expenses and/or any amount
deemed fit and proper in the light of the facts
and circumstances and in accordance with the
income and standard of living of the Respondent
No. 1 as mentioned hereinabove U/s 20 of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,
2005;
f. To pass an Order for the compensation to the
extent of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five
Lakhs Only) to the Applicant and directing all the
Respondents jointly and/or severally to pay
compensation or Damages on account of Mental
Torture, Harassment, Physical suffering and
Emotional Distress and Trauma caused by the
acts of domestic Violence committed by all the
Respondents and for the Physical and Mental
Torture suffered by the Applicant U/s 22 of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence act,
2005;
g. To pass Interim, Ad-Interim and Ex-Parte
Orders and Reliefs in the nature of Prayer Clause
(a) to (f) pending the hearing and final disposal
of this Application U/s 23 of the Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence act, 2005;
h. To pass such other and further Order as this
Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the nature
and circumstances of the case;
i. Cost of this Applicant be provided to the
Applicant.
j. Such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble
court deems fit and proper.”
Page 3
Sonali
908-WP-2499-2026.DOC
3. After perusal of the D.V. proceedings, it was found that in the
D.V. proceedings very serious allegations are made and in fact,
even “Mangalsutra” which, Respondent No.2 was wearing was
removed forcibly on the second day of marriage.
4. As the Court has shown disinclination to entertain the
Petition and expressed that the Writ Petition is required to be
dismissed with heavy costs, on written instructions of the
Petitioner, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, after
arguing the matter for some time, seeks withdrawal of the Writ
Petition.
5. The said written instructions are taken on record and
marked ‘X’ for identification.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Digitally
signed by
SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
2026.09.11
18:09:15
+0530
Page 4
Sonali
Checking your session…