Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANTOSH RAMSHARAN PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Ramsharan Pandey, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 17 February 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • non‑prosecution
  • petition dismissal
  • writ petition
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                    20-wp250.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 250 OF 2021

            Santosh Ramsharan Pandey                                   …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, after 17th February, 2021, neither the

            Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

            even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                         1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:05 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.