Bombay High Court

SATKAR UJWALA LAXMAN AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided: 1 October 2026
Disposal: Allowed

Holding

The Court held that the order dated 1 October 2026 does not apply to the petitioners whose names were deleted or who have resigned.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. In a prior order dated 1 October 2026, the names of certain petitioners (Bandgar Laxman Dnyande, Rayate Vinayak Pandit, and Khadbade Rajesh Narshingrao) were inadvertently retained despite earlier deletions or resignation. The petitioners sought clarification that the order should not apply to those individuals. The Court clarified that the order dated 1 October 2026 will not apply to the three petitioners whose names had been deleted or who had resigned. The petitioners' counsel raised no objection to this clarification, and the matter was concluded with the clarification being recorded.

Issues considered

Whether the order dated 1 October 2026 applies to petitioners whose names were previously deleted or who have resigned

Subjects

writ petition
clarification
order amendment
civil appellate jurisdiction
Bombay High Court

Judgment

               Digitally signed
               by ARUNA
     ARUNA     SANDEEP
     SANDEEP   TALWALKAR
     TALWALKAR Date:
               2026.10.08                                 501.WP2566.2005.odt
               18:24:03 +0530




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        WRIT PETITION NO.2566 OF 2005

Satkar Ujwala Laxman & Ors.                       … Petitioners
     Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.                 … Respondents

                            --------------
Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/b. Mr. Nitin Kulkarni, Advocate for the
Petitioners.
Mr. G.H. Keluskar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. G.P. a/w. Ms. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for
Respondent/State.
                            --------------
                             CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                           SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                    DATE :   7th OCTOBER, 2026

P.C. :


1.           Not on board. Upon production taken on board.

2.           This is the motion for speaking to the minutes of the

Judgement dated 1st October, 2026 taken by the learned Counsel

for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

3.           Suffice it to observe that Petitioner No. 4’s name Bandgar

Laxman Dnyande and Petitioner No. 12 name Rayate Vinayak

Pandit has already been deleted by order dated 9 th February, 2010

and the Petitioner No. 8 Khadbade Rajesh Narshingrao has



Talwalkar                           1
                                                          501.WP2566.2005.odt



resigned from the service. Their names were appearing in the

Judgement and Order dated 1st October, 2026 because the

Petitioners have not carried out the consequential amendments.

4.          It is clarified that the said Judgement and Order dated 1 st

October, 2026 will not apply so far as the Petitioner No. 4 Bandgar

Laxman Dnyande and Petitioner No. 12 Rayate Vinayak Pandit

and Petitioner No. 8 Khadbade Rajesh Narshingrao.

5.          The learned Counsel for the Petitioners has no objection

to the aforesaid clarification.



(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                           (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Talwalkar                         2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.