Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SABIR ALI MAJHAR ALI SHAIKHversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is held to be infructuous and is disposed of.

Summary

Sabir Ali Majhar Ali Shaikh filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The petitioner, through counsel Ms. Dipti Salunke (by Mr. Abhijeet Kandarkar), later submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no further issue to be adjudicated. No substantive factual or legal dispute remained. Consequently, the judges ordered the petition to be closed as infructuous, thereby disposing of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                        42 WP 2575-24-OS.DOC




                                                                                     Priya Soparkar

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION


                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 2575 OF 2024
                      Sabir Ali Majhar Ali Shaikh                                  …Petitioner
                            Versus
                      The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai            …Respondent
                      and anr.


                      Ms. Dipti Salunke i/by Mr. Abhijeet Kandarkar, for the Petitioner.


                                            CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM &
                                                   ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
                                            DATED:      17th AUGUST 2026.
                      PC:-

                      1.     Ms. Dipti Salunke, learned counsel appearing for the

                      Petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

                      The same be, accordingly, closed.


                      2.     In view of the above submission made by the Petitioner’s

                      counsel, this Petition stands disposed of, as infructuous.



                      (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)                         (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
                                                                                                  {




         Digitally
         signed by
         PRIYA
PRIYA    RAJESH
RAJESH   SOPARKAR
SOPARKAR Date:
         2026.08.19
         11:41:05
         +0530




                                                     Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.