Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

EKTA A. AKSHAY MULEY (BEFORE MARRIAGE EKTA HARILAL VARMA)versusAKSHAY DHANAJI MULEY

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Ekta A. Akshay Muley, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondent, Akshay Dhanaji Muley, was served notice but no substantive opposition was recorded. The Court, after hearing the counsel's submission, considered whether it could permit the withdrawal. It held that the petition could be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, the petition was allowed to be withdrawn and the matter was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and be given liberty to file a fresh petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                               74-WP-2612-2025 (C).doc


        Shubhada S Kadam


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 2612 OF 2025

                       Ekta A. Akshay Muley (before Marriage Ekta
                       Harilal Varma)                                   ...Petitioner/s
                       Versus
                       Akshay Dhanaji Muley                             ...Respondent/s
                       _________________________________________________________________

                       Mr. Ansar Baluvar, Advocate for Petitioner.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                             CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                             DATE        :   7th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for

                       the respondent.

                       2.         Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave

                       to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition.

                       3.         Considering the submission of learned counsel for the

                       petitioner, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty

                       and disposed of.

                                                                       (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




         Digitally
         signed by
         SHUBHADA
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
SHANKAR KADAM
KADAM    Date:
         2026.09.09
         11:17:34
         +0530




                                                         Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.