Bombay High Court
KAJAL ANIKET KATE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners upon settlement of the dispute and therefore allowed its withdrawal.
Summary
The petitioners, Sonali Milind Patil and Kajal Aniket Kate, filed a criminal writ petition (No. 2621 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. They informed the Court that the underlying dispute had been settled between the parties. Accordingly, they moved the Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. The Court examined the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court permitted the petition to be withdrawn and ordered the petition to be disposed of.
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ
- criminal writ petition
- settlement of dispute
- high court procedure
Judgment
905-WP-2621-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2621 OF 2026
signed by
SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
2026.09.03 Kajal Aniket Kate & Anr. …Petitioners
10:32:57
+0530 Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Harshwardhan M. Pawar a/w. Mr. Padmasinh P. Patil, for the
Petitioner.
Mrs. Savita M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Dattu Amruta Talpade, Police Hawaldar, Narayangaon Police
Station, Pune Gramin, Pune, present.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-
1. Mr. Harshwardhan Pawar, learned Counsel appearing for the
Petitioners states that as the dispute is settled between the parties,
he seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
and disposed of as such.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 1
Sonali
Checking your session…