Bombay High Court
SAHEBRAO LAXMAN PHADversusGOKUL LAXMAN PHAD
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition abates upon the death of the petitioner when no legal representative is on record.
Summary
The petitioner, Sahebrao Laxman Phad, filed a writ petition which remained pending when he died on 9 October 2024. No legal representatives were brought on record to continue the proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner informed the Court of the death. The Court held that in the absence of any representative, the petition stands abated. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as abated, with a direction that the petitioner’s legal representatives may approach the Court to set aside the abatement and be impleaded in place of the deceased. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition continues after the death of the petitioner when no legal representative is on record?
Subjects
- Writ Petition
- Abatement
- Death of Petitioner
- Legal Representation
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40136
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
949 WRIT PETITION NO. 2630 OF 2022
Sahebrao Laxman Phad
VERSUS
Gokul Laxman Phad
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Krushna N. Bhosale h/f Mr. Ajay T
Kanawade
...
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
Dated : September 02, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner has
expired on 09/10/2024. His legal representatives are not brought on
record.
2. The petition is disposed of as abated.
3. It will be open for the legal representatives of the petitioner to
take appropriate steps for setting aside abatement and for impleading
their names in place of the deceased petitioner.
( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…