Bombay High Court

YOGESHWAR NAGARI SAHAKARI PATHPEDI MARYADIT THR ITS MANAGER SHRI MAHENDRA PANDITRAO GORE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Yogeshwar Nagari Sahakari Pathpedi Maryadit and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the petition was listed, the petitioners, through their counsel, submitted a communication dated 23 September 2026 indicating their intention not to pursue the petition further. The court recorded the communication and marked it for identification. Considering the petitioners' clear intention to withdraw, the court exercised its inherent power to accept the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether a petitioner may withdraw a writ petition after filing it before the High Court

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
civil procedure
high court
jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43184


                          IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              11 WRIT PETITION NO. 2661 OF 2022

                Yogeshwar Nagari Sahakari Pathpedi Maryadit Thr Its Manager Shri
                             Mahendra Panditrao Gore And Others
                                           VERSUS
                            The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                                ...
                        Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Patil Shrikant S.
                         AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. D. B. Bhange
                                                ...

                                  CORAM      : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
                                  Dated      : September 23, 2026

           PER COURT :-

           1.       Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, makes a

           motion to withdraw the petition.

           2.       The learned Advocate for the petitioner tenders across the Bar a

           communication dated 23rd September 2026, signed by the petitioner

           and addressed to the learned Registrar of this Court, stating that the

           petitioner does not intend to prosecute the petition further.

           3.       The said communication is taken on record and marked as “X”

           for identification.

           4.       In view of the said communication, the petition is disposed of as

           withdrawn.



                                                             ( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. )




           vj gawade/-.



                                              Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…