Bombay High Court

MAHENDRA PALKU YADAVversusRELIANCE ENTERPRISES AND 3 ORS

Decided: 19 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is disposed without examining its merits.

Summary

The petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition and requested liberty to make representations to the authority if needed. The Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal and clarified that the merits of the petition were not examined and all contentions remain open. The Court also permitted the petitioners to file a fresh petition in the future. Consequently, the writ petition was formally disposed of without any substantive adjudication. The order was signed by Justices M.S. Karnik and Sandesh D. Patil on 19 August 2026.

Subjects

procedural
writ petition
withdrawal
disposal

Judgment

                                                      33E. WP 2685-2019.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO.2685 OF 2019

Mahendra Palku Yadav                        ….   Petitioner
         Versus
Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors.             …    Respondents
                               …..
Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners.
Adv. Shivani Samel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Anoop Patil a/w Mr. Darpan Gupta and Ms. Kasturi Marathe for
Respondent Nos.6 and 7-SRA.
Smt. Madhura Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
                               …..
                            CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                    SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                 DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026
P.C.

1.            The learned Counsel for the Petitioners fairly submits on

instructions that he may be permitted to withdraw the Petition, with

liberty to the Petitioners to make representation to the Authority, if

necessary.


2.         It is made clear that we have not examined the contentions

raised in the Writ Petition on merits and all the contentions of the

parties are kept open.



RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                     1/2
                                                            33E. WP 2685-2019.doc

3.        Liberty to file a fresh Petition is also kept open.


4.        The Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                              (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                           2/2
               Digitally signed by
 RAJESH    RAJESH VASANT
 VASANT    CHITTEWAN
 CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.08.21
           16:04:05 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.