Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HEMANT DINESH BAGDIversusRELIANCE ENTERPRISES AND 3 ORS

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of it without addressing the merits.

Summary

The petitioners, represented by Mr. Jayesh Bhatt, sought relief against Reliance Enterprises and others. The petitioners requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, retaining the liberty to make a fresh representation before the authority if needed. The Court, without examining the merits of the substantive contentions, granted the withdrawal request. It also kept open the possibility for the petitioners to file a fresh petition in the future. Consequently, the writ petition was formally disposed of.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • procedural disposal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                      33G. WP 2707-2019.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO.2707 OF 2019

Hemant Dinesh Bagdi                         ….   Petitioner
         Versus
Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors.             …    Respondents
                               …..
Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners.
Adv. Shivani Samel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Anoop Patil a/w Mr. Darpan Gupta and Ms. Kasturi Marathe for
Respondent Nos.6 and 7-SRA.
Smt. Madhura Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
                               …..
                            CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                    SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                 DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026
P.C.

1.            The learned Counsel for the Petitioners fairly submits on

instructions that he may be permitted to withdraw the Petition, with

liberty to the Petitioners to make representation to the Authority, if

necessary.


2.         It is made clear that we have not examined the contentions

raised in the Writ Petition on merits and all the contentions of the

parties are kept open.



RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                     1/2
                                                           33G. WP 2707-2019.doc

3.        Liberty to file a fresh Petition is also kept open.


4.        The Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                              (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                          2/2
              Digitally signed
RAJESH    by RAJESH
          VASANT
VASANT    CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.08.21
              16:09:11 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.