Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NAMAN AGRAWALversusTATA INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (TISS)

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court may correct a clerical error in its order without prejudice to the parties.

Summary

The Bombay High Court heard a petition to correct a clerical mistake in its earlier order dated 3 June 2026, where the law firm’s name was incorrectly recorded as “H V Kini & Co.” instead of “M V Kini & Co.” The Court examined whether such a correction could be made without a fresh hearing. It held that correcting a typographical error does not affect the substantive rights of the parties and may be done suo motu. Accordingly, the Court ordered the name to be corrected and directed that the revised order be uploaded on its website. No other substantive issues were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a typographical error in the name of a party in a court order can be corrected without a fresh hearing

Subjects

  • clerical error
  • order correction
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                           1
                                                                               1. WP(L)-18182-2026.doc

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 2712 OF 2026

                      Naman Agrawal                                        …      Petitioner
         Digitally
         signed by
         AMOL
                            Versus
AMOL     PREMNATH
PREMNATH JADHAV
JADHAV   Date:
         2026.06.11
                      Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) & Ors.      …      Respondents
         20:13:03
         +0530




                                                    ******
                      Mr. Rohit Jadhav a/w Ms. Aishwarya Bapat i/b Vis Legis Law Practice
                      for Petitioner.
                      Mr. Dheer Sampat i/b M V Kini & Co. for Respondent No. 1 (TISS).
                                                    ******

                                               CORAM :      SHYAM C. CHANDAK AND
                                                            FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.
                                                  DATE :    11th JUNE, 2026

                      P.C. :
                      1)        The matter is taken on board for speaking to the minutes of the

                      order dated 3rd June 2026.

                      2)        In the cause-title, the name ‘M V Kini & Co.’ has been

                      erroneously mentioned as ‘H V Kini & Co.’. The same shall stand

                      corrected and be read as ‘M V Kini & Co.’.

                      3)        Upon carrying out the aforesaid correction, the corrected order

                      be uploaded on the official website of this Court.



                        (FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.)                      (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)



                      Shubham Gadhavepatil                                                               ….1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.